The Cost of Indecision

A still forest lake in the early morning. Ripples are spreading after something was thrown into the lake. Suggest actions and implications.

Indecision in business isn't just a minor hiccup—it has tangible, often substantial, costs. Recent studies highlight the significant impact of delayed decision-making on organizational efficiency and financial performance.

For instance, a McKinsey study estimates that inefficient decision-making processes can cost Fortune 500 companies up to 530,000 days of lost working time annually, translating to approximately $250 million in wasted labor costs each year or 9 days of lost productivity per employee. Even more striking, the same study found that more than half of the time individuals spend making decisions is considered inefficient.

An infographic showing that on average each employee loses 9 days per year to unclear or delayed decision-making.

Beyond financial implications, indecision can erode team morale, foster a culture of blame, and reduce organizational focus. A 2023 study published in the Leadership & Organization Development Journal found that strategic leader indecision contributes to stalled execution, peer mistrust, and team disengagement. As one interviewee put it, "Indecision is the real cost to the business... teams, instead of focusing on the right things, get caught up in wondering what’s going to happen."

In essence, while taking time to make informed decisions is essential, prolonged indecision can lead to missed opportunities, increased costs, and diminished team engagement. Recognizing and addressing the root causes of indecision is crucial for maintaining organizational agility and competitiveness.

Why It Happens

According to the Leadership & Organization Development Journal, indecision at the senior leadership level often stems from a mix of organizational, interpersonal, and personal factors:

  • Complex structures and hierarchy – Multi-layered reporting lines and overlapping responsibilities slow down approvals and obscure who owns the final call.

  • Geographic fragmentation – Different regional priorities or cultural contexts create conflict and indecision, particularly in global or matrixed organizations.

  • Informal power dynamics and politics – Decisions are often swayed or delayed by alliances, turf protection, or behind-the-scenes influence.

  • Lack of trust among peers – When senior leaders don’t fully trust each other’s motives or capabilities, they hesitate to commit or support decisions.

  • Fear of failure or accountability – Leaders delay decisions to avoid being blamed if the outcome doesn’t go as planned.

  • Conflict avoidance – In highly political environments, leaders may avoid taking a stance to prevent tension or fallout within the team.

These forces combine to create an environment where indecision becomes a cultural norm—reinforced by past inaction and amplified by organizational complexity.

What To Do

To address the root causes of indecision, leaders must act with intention—countering complexity, politics, and hesitation with clarity, structure, and action:

  • Set a decision deadline
    Complex structures and endless discussions often drag decisions out. Assigning a clear "decide by" date keeps momentum and prevents organizational gridlock.

  • Clarify ownership
    Overlapping roles and informal influence can blur responsibility. Use tools like RACI or RAPID to clarify who owns the final decision and who contributes input.

  • Foster trust and peer alignment
    If lack of trust or fear of sabotage exists, leaders should create space for aligned decision-making through shared goals, transparent discussion, and feedback loops.

  • Limit and frame the options
    Too many choices fuel analysis paralysis, especially in complex or politically sensitive environments. Narrowing decisions to a few actionable paths can reduce overwhelm and speed up resolution. Provide clear criteria for evaluating options—such as strategic fit, risk, and resource impact—to guide teams toward aligned, confident choices.

  • Document and share the rationale
    Fear of failure or second-guessing often stems from lack of clarity. Explaining the “why” behind a decision creates buy-in and supports learning—even when outcomes vary.

  • Create a culture that tolerates healthy conflict
    Encourage respectful dissent and surface disagreement early. Avoidance often delays decisions that need to be made.

Indecision thrives in complexity, but it doesn’t have to. The path to better, faster decisions starts by simplifying structures, clarifying ownership, and building a culture where trust, feedback, and accountability are the norm. When leaders create the conditions for confident action—even in uncertain environments—teams follow. A culture of decisiveness isn’t about perfection. It’s about moving forward, learning fast, and building momentum.